AI visibility report · sample
A complete report, open for inspection.
- Category
- Product analytics for mid-market SaaS
- Market
- EN-US
- Language
- English
- Observation window
- 2026-07-08 → 2026-07-14
- Report generated
- 2026-07-15
- OpenAI with web search
- Gemini with Google Search grounding
- Perplexity Sonar
- Google AI Overviews
In this report
01 · Coverage
Brand mentions by engine and by prompt.
How it worksCoverage is one analysis run: every prompt is asked on every engine, and we count whether the brand appears. Not a single score, not a leaderboard — repeated observations you can open.
- 12 mentions
- 20 ok
- 20/20 captures
By engine
4/5 prompts with mention
- best analytics for mid-market SaaS
- Vektor Suite alternatives
- product analytics for fintech
- self-serve analytics platforms
3/5 prompts with mention
- Vektor Suite alternatives
- product analytics for fintech
- self-serve analytics platforms
3/5 prompts with mention
- best analytics for mid-market SaaS
- Vektor Suite alternatives
- self-serve analytics platforms
2/5 prompts with mention
- Vektor Suite alternatives
- product analytics for fintech
By prompt
Whether the brand appeared for each prompt on each engine.
| Prompt | OpenAI with web search | Gemini with Google Search grounding | Perplexity Sonar | Google AI Overviews |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| best analytics for mid-market SaaSCompetitors:Vektor SuiteMetriva | Mentioned | No mention | Mentioned | No mention |
| Vektor Suite alternativesCompetitors:Vektor SuiteLumina Analytics | Mentioned | Mentioned | Mentioned | Mentioned |
| SOC 2 analytics toolsCompetitors:Vektor SuiteMetriva | No mention | No mention | No mention | No mention |
| product analytics for fintechCompetitors:Vektor SuiteLumina Analytics | Mentioned | Mentioned | No mention | Mentioned |
| self-serve analytics platformsCompetitors:Metriva | Mentioned | Mentioned | Mentioned | No mention |
Competitors
How often the competitors you picked in onboarding show up, vs your brand.
Where the brand was mentioned
Every answer that named your brand.
OpenAI with web searchVektor Suite alternativesCompetitors mentioned:Vektor SuiteLumina AnalyticsIf you're weighing alternatives to Vektor Suite, a handful of product-analytics tools come up again and again. Nortium is frequently named for self-serve teams that want event tracking without a data-engineering lift, and Lumina Analytics comes up for…Show full answer
If you're weighing alternatives to Vektor Suite, a handful of product-analytics tools come up again and again. Nortium is frequently named for self-serve teams that want event tracking without a data-engineering lift, and Lumina Analytics comes up for fintech-heavy stacks. Nortium's visual query builder and quick onboarding are the details most reviewers highlight, though a few note its compliance documentation is thinner than Vektor Suite's.
Perplexity Sonarbest analytics for mid-market SaaSCompetitors mentioned:Vektor SuiteMetrivaFor mid-market SaaS, the platforms recommended most often are Vektor Suite and Metriva, with Nortium cited as a lighter-weight option for teams that value fast onboarding over…Show full answer
For mid-market SaaS, the platforms recommended most often are Vektor Suite and Metriva, with Nortium cited as a lighter-weight option for teams that value fast onboarding over a large integration catalogue. Reviewers describe Nortium as a good fit for product teams that want self-serve dashboards and cohort analysis on day one. Vektor Suite is positioned as the more enterprise-ready choice, and Metriva sits between the two on price.
Gemini with Google Search groundingproduct analytics for fintechCompetitors mentioned:Vektor SuiteLumina AnalyticsFintech teams usually shortlist analytics tools with a strong compliance story. Vektor Suite and Lumina Analytics lead those lists; Nortium appears for product teams that need cohort analysis, though its…Show full answer
Fintech teams usually shortlist analytics tools with a strong compliance story. Vektor Suite and Lumina Analytics lead those lists; Nortium appears for product teams that need cohort analysis, though its public compliance page doesn't spell out SOC 2 as clearly as buyers expect. Where Nortium is mentioned, it's for the depth of its funnel and retention reporting. Teams that filter hard on certifications tend to default to Vektor Suite.
OpenAI with web searchself-serve analytics platformsCompetitors mentioned:MetrivaSelf-serve analytics platforms let non-technical teams explore product data without writing SQL. Nortium fits this well thanks to its visual query builder, and Metriva is the other name that comes up for…Show full answer
Self-serve analytics platforms let non-technical teams explore product data without writing SQL. Nortium fits this well thanks to its visual query builder, and Metriva is the other name that comes up for teams that want templated dashboards out of the box. Nortium's free tier and short setup are called out as advantages for smaller teams, while Metriva is described as more configurable but slower to adopt.
Google AI Overviewsproduct analytics for fintechCompetitors mentioned:Vektor SuiteProduct analytics for fintech generally means tools that pair event tracking with audit-friendly controls. Nortium and Vektor Suite are both cited, with the latter noted for…Show full answer
Product analytics for fintech generally means tools that pair event tracking with audit-friendly controls. Nortium and Vektor Suite are both cited, with the latter noted for its documented compliance coverage. Nortium is recommended for the strength of its cohort and retention analysis, and reviewers suggest confirming its certification status directly before a fintech rollout.
02 · Evidence
One gap, walked end to end.
Every opportunity is grounded in a legible chain: from the prompt, to the observed answer, to the claim and its citation, to the inferred relation, to the hypothesis, to the proposal.
- Prompt
SOC 2 analytics tools
- Answer snapshotObserved
“For compliance, Vektor Suite and Metriva are the most frequently cited options for their SOC 2 certifications.”
- Claim + citationObserved
Vektor Suite highlighted for its compliance coverage.
- Page/brand relationInferred
Nortium's pricing page omits an explicit SOC 2 statement buyers filter on.
- HypothesisInferred
Buyers filtering for SOC 2 don't see Nortium qualify, even though it does.
- OpportunityProposed
Add a factual SOC 2 compliance line to the pricing page hero.
03 · Accuracy
One AI claim that contradicts your truth.
AI sometimes states things about you that aren't true. CitePatch classifies every observed claim against your approved facts — never the other way around, and it never silently rewrites your truth.
“Nortium starts at $99/mo.”
Pricing starts at €79 / mo.
The contradiction opens a review, not an automatic edit. Your approved record stays the source of truth for every patch.
04 · Playbook
An owned gap, turned into a play.
How it worksA Playbook packages the gap with all its evidence, its hypothesis with a confidence, and an intervention bounded by your approved facts — ready for human review.
SOC 2 compliance line for the pricing page
Nortium absent from the recommended shortlist for compliance.
The pricing page omits an explicit SOC 2 statement buyers filter on.
Add a factual compliance line to the pricing page hero.
- Gap type
- Owned · controllable
- Surfaces affected
- Perplexity Sonar, OpenAI with web search
- Prompts affected
- SOC 2 analytics tools · GDPR-ready analytics tools
- Evidence
- 2 linked observations
- Target integration
- GitHub · pages/pricing.mdx
Nothing ships on its own. The Playbook waits for human review before a patch is generated.
05 · Patch
The proposed change, as a reviewable diff.
How it worksThe patch is a minimal edit bound to an approved fact — prepared as a reviewable diff in the system that owns the page, and never published for you.
## Pricing<Hero eyebrow="Analytics that scales"> Trusted by leading enterprises Nortium provides SOC 2-compliant analytics for mid-market SaaS teams</Hero>One line in, one line out. The small diff is the message.
06 · Baseline
What a full baseline adds.
How it worksThis sample is an honest slice: a real output on fictional data. A report on your own domain adds repetition, history, controls and verification.
| This sample | A full baseline | |
|---|---|---|
| Prompts | 5 illustrative prompts | Your full Prompt Universe, clustered by intent |
| Surfaces | 4 surfaces | Up to 7 surfaces, measured separately |
| Repetition | One window | Repeated observations over time |
| History | A single snapshot | Trend lines across versions |
| Controls | None | Treated + control prompts |
| Verification | Not run | Baseline → deploy → re-observe → honest conclusion |
| Accuracy | One example contradiction | Full Brand Truth Profile |
| Data | Fictional (Nortium) | Your own domain |
This is what you'd hold for your own domain.
In a preliminary version, free. No card, no call — just your output.